|
Anthrax
Q & A, Update on State of Cases in the U.S.
Complete
article highlighting some key facts regarding anthrax, followed
by excerpts of news articles detailing the extent of the infection
events in the U.S. ...
-
- - begin article - - -
What
causes anthrax?
Anthrax
is caused by the organism Bacillus anthracis. In
some parts of the world, this can be found in cattle or other
hoofed mammals.
It
is infrequent in western Europe and the US, and is more likely
to be found in animals in south and central America, south and
east Europe, Asia and Africa.
This
bacteria can form spores which can either be eaten in contaminated
meat, breathed in, or simply infect the skin directly through
human to animal contact.

What
are the symptoms?
There
are three types of anthrax, depending on where the infectious
spore has arrived on the patient.
The
first, cutaneous anthrax, is the least serious of the three,
and produces a skin lesion, which is rarely painful. However,
if left untreated, the infection can spread and cause blood
poisoning, which is fatal in one in 20 cases.
The
second type is intestinal anthrax, caused by the consumption
of contaminated meat. This produces severe food-poisoning type
symptoms, leading to fever and blood poisoning. It is frequently
fatal.
The
third is respiratory anthrax, which happens when spores are
breathed in by the patient and lodge in the lung. Symptoms of
this disease start out as similar to simple flu, but respiratory
symptoms rapidly worsen and the patient usually goes into some
kind of shock between two and six days later. Again,
this is frequently fatal.
Is
anthrax contagious?
No.
It is an infectious disease, but not contagious. An infectious
illness spreads and grows within the body, a contagious disease
spreads from person to person. Because the disease is not contagious,
only those directly exposed to the spores have any chance of
falling ill.
How
deadly is it?
A
1993 report estimated that releasing a cloud of 100kg of spores
upwind of Washington DC could cause between 130,000 and 3m deaths.
Does
exposure always mean infection?
Being
exposed to anthrax spores does not necessarily mean that you
will develop an infection. Many of the spores are dormant, and
pose no threat. In addition, infection will only result if sufficient
numbers of the spores germinate and release harmful bacteria
in sufficient quantities.

Bacillus anthracis spores
Small
amounts of the bacteria can be killed off by the body's immune
system. It is estimated that 10,000 spores are needed to cause
infection. Once
anthrax spores have lodged in the lung and caused an infection,
nine out of 10 patients die.
Can
anthrax be treated?
Giving
antibiotics to anthrax patients can cure the disease, particularly
the cutaneous variety. The antibiotic of choice is ciprofloxacin,
or Cipro. However,
unless it is given swiftly after intestinal or respiratory infection,
the chances of cure are greatly reduced.
Is
there a vaccine?
There
is a vaccine against anthrax, but this is not recommended except
for those at high risk, such as meat industry workers and laboratory
scientists handling the disease.
Is
it easy to make?
Culturing
large quantities of anthrax spores is a complicated task, but
certainly not beyond the capacity of many nations. During the
1990s, it was suggested that at least 17 nations had some biological
weapons capacity.
-
- - end of article - - -
Source:
Excerpt
from article describing a letter containing anthrax (per preliminary
tests) received today by the office of Senate Majority Leader
Thomas Daschle:
-
- - begin excerpt - - -
...
President Bush announced the delivery of the deadly bacteria
after a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.
"His
office received a letter and it had anthrax in it," Bush
said. "The letter was field-tested. And the staffers that
have been exposed are being treated."
...
Today's discovery in Washington comes after anthrax was detected
in three states over the past 10 days: In Florida, one man died
and five others have been infected; in New York, at least one
woman has contracted a skin form of the anthrax disease; and
in Nevada, all workers who handled a letter mailed from Malaysia
have tested negative for anthrax.

The
package, sent to Daschle's personal office in the Hart Building
just several hundred yards from the Capitol, "had been
wrapped a lot," Bush said. Other sources said the envelope
was taped tightly, perhaps to elude chemical scanning. Inside
the envelope was a powdery substance.

Some
Postal Workers
Playing It Safe
Sources
close to the investigation said the package was postmarked Trenton.
An envelope containing anthrax sent to NBC anchorman Tom Brokaw
also originated in the New Jersey capital. ...
-
- - end excerpt - - -
Source:
Excerpt
from article describing a case of a child of an ABC News employee
in New York discovered to have skin anthrax.
-
- - begin excerpt - - -
...
the baby boy of an ABC News employee had tested positive for
cutaneous anthrax - a less dangerous form of the disease absorbed
through cuts or scratches on the skin.
The
child, who is reported to be responding well to treatment, had
briefly visited ABC's New York newsroom on 28 September.
Police
are now questioning ABC employees and conducting environmental
searches at ABC and other media organisations. ...
-
- - end excerpt - - -
Source:
There
Is No God?
If
you define god as the
- be-all
- end-all
- over-all
- super-knowing
- super-creator
- super-immortalizing
- prayer-answering
- intervening
- loving
- caring
- master
beyond master ...
...
of all that ever has been, is, will be, or can be,
you know, the generally perceived god of christian / muslim
/ jewish fame ...
...
in order to claim that such an entity exists, one must solve
the inconsistencies present in such an all-encompassing all-involved
entity that cannot logically be both omnipotent and omniscient.
Furthermore,
one would be well-served to ponder the following reasonable
analysis ...
- Naturalism
explains all that is known.
- God
explains nothing but human desire to reach into the unknown
and create a human-centric super-being, as humans created
them, over 1,800 well-known ones, to satisfy an array of
- needs,
- fears,
- desires
...
- ...
rather than god revealed itself to humans in ______ (insert
huge list of irreconcilable and logically inconsistent claims
without one iota of evidence that any of them were -or- are
anything but human imagination).
An
omnipotent god could reveal itself to the world in any of innumerable
indisputable ways. A nonexistent god cannot. A god made-up by
ancients cannot, will never
reveal itself in an indisputable way. Why?
Because
the god of the ancients is demonstrably "make believe",
logically
impossible, never really existed, and cannot exist in the physical
world or the logical world.
That
god of human construction can only exist in the human imagination
and even there, it still fails to mate to logic or reason, for
the imaginary world has no need for such things.
There
are no limits on what the human imagination can concoct when
it comes to god. It's like the absence of logical restraint
in dreams.
Into
the incomprehensible, into the unknown, one would be wise to
place a naturalistic fate and a naturalistic state of being.
Put
another way ...
Know
not god ...
...
and all that is beyond the capability of humans to know and
comprehend, all that has been 'til now called god, is known
by those for whom god is neither comprehended, claimed, or known
...
From
Alan Watts' -The Wisdom of Insecurity- ...
"...
The Hindu Upanishads say:
He
who thinks that god is not comprehended, by him god is comprehended;
but he who thinks that god is comprehended knows him not - god
is unknown to those who know him, and is known to those who
do not know him at all."
-
- -
I
would interpret that liberally and perceive that in knowing
god is incomprehensible and in knowing not god, those of the
disbelief / doubt / distance from faith community are closer
to knowing the whys and wherefores of "all that is",
a concept commonly called god, than are those of the religious
/ faith crowd who claim to know god.
Source:
|
8
New Planets Found Orbiting Nearby Stars
Excerpts
from article describing the latest planetary discoveries, bringing
the total number of extra-solar planets to 74 :
-
- - begin excerpts - - -

Artist's
Depiction of Newly Discovered World
An
international team of astronomers has discovered eight new extra-solar
planets. Three of them are Jupiter-sized planets in circular
orbits around their parent stars.
"Previous
planets were very different from our own," says Dr Hugh
Jones, of Liverpool John Moores University, "We're now
starting to see, if not twins, then second cousins."
These
planets constitute a new class of extra-solar giant planets
with orbits similar to that of the Earth and Mars in our Solar
System. The eight new worlds bring the total number of planets
known to be circling other stars to 74.
...
The Keck Planet Search found five of the new objects and the Anglo-Australian
Planet Search found three. They range in mass from 0.8 to 10 times
the mass of Jupiter, the largest planet in our Solar System.
They
have orbital periods between six days and six years. They orbit
their stars at distances ranging from about 0.7 to 3 times the
Earth-Sun distance. ...
-
- - end excerpts - - -
Source:
Baboons
Found to be Capable of Abstract Reasoning
Excerpt
from articles detailing scientific tests which indicate baboons
can analyze and compare objects on a level of understanding
previously unevidenced in non-human, non-ape primates:
-
- - begin excerpts - - -
Baboons
are capable of performing complex tasks that involve abstract
reasoning, a mental ability that only humans and some chimpan-zees
were thought to possess, researchers say.

Humans
and baboons
diverged 30 million years ago
In
a series of experiments, researchers at the University of Iowa
showed that two baboons could become adept at understanding
and identifying abstract relationships between patterns of pictures
of objects.
It
is the first time that a non-human, non-ape primate has been
shown to have the capacity for abstract thought, psychologists
say.
Baboons
are part of an evolutionary fork about 30 million years ago.
As "old-world monkeys", they have no linguistic ability
and were thought to possess less sophisticated reasoning abilities.
Their
ability to perform abstract thinking provides an important clue
into how - and whether - language affects the mind's ability
to perform complex tasks of reasoning, researchers say.
...
The team believes its experiments show baboons are capable of
analogous thinking, a trait usually only attributed to humans
and chimpanzees.
...
The research is likely to provoke discussion because baboons
belong to a primate family which split around 30 million years
ago from the ancestors which gave rise to humans and chimpanzees.
Chimpanzees and humans are much more closely related.
"Analogical
thinking and its possible precursors may very well be found
in nonhuman animals - if only we assiduously look for them.
The search may be long and hard...," write the research
team.
-
- - end excerpts - - -
Sources:
- Sydney
Morning Herald [link inactive]
- BBC
Time
for the Ground War?
After
a week of air strikes in Afghanistan, the next moves, political
and military, are beginning to find their way to the array of
special forces united to put an end to seeds of global terrorism
and an ongoing humanitarian disaster in one of the harshest
locales on earth:
-
- - begin excerpts - - -
Down
And Dirty
After
a week of air strikes in Afghanistan, U.S. special forces are
putting boots on the ground.
...
The silent war against terrorism--the one that takes place in
police stations, law courts and banks--isn't over and won't
be for years. But
last week the noisy war, the one marked by percussive blasts
that shake mountains, by the rattle of small-arms fire and the
air-sucking whump of a fuel-air explosive, finally started.
Like
all battles, it had an other-worldly quality. The cruise missiles
and precision-guided bombs that thudded into Afghanistan, the
B-2 Stealth bombers, half-circling the globe from Whiteman Air
Force Base in Missouri to Central Asia, all seem more at home
in a science-fiction novel than on the evening news.
But
stripped to its essence, this new form of war is as old as the
hills. Victory still requires one group of men to find and kill
another. Technology can't do it all. "The cruise missiles
and bombers are not going to solve this problem," said
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld last week.
...
Special forces are going to carry a greater share of the burden
than in any war ever waged by the U.S. Already, sources tell
TIME, a number of Delta Force commandos and CIA agents, together
with members of the elite British SAS 22nd regiment, are in
eastern Afghanistan, conducting strategic reconnaissance of
targets linked to the al-Qaeda terrorist network.
Special-operations
soldiers are thought to be acting as spotters for the bombing
raids; a senior diplomatic source in Paris says a small number
of French intelligence agents in Afghanistan are also helping
identify targets.
A
Green Beret contingent is on its way to act as liaison and to
train officers with the Taliban's opponents in the Northern
Alliance.
For
President George W. Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair
and their soldiers, the moment of pivot has come.
...
If the war is now real for Americans, it is no less so for Afghans,
even though those who live in that Texas-size country have been
fighting the Soviets or one another for more than 20 years.
...
Special forces are going to have to do the dirty work. It
won't be easy.
The
U.S. has three options for running commandos into Afghanistan.
It can use the bases in Pakistan or Uzbekistan; it can establish
a temporary camp in Afghanistan; or it can use the U.S.S. Kitty
Hawk, now loading up in Oman, as a base for the 160th Special
Operations Aviation Regiment, the Army's commando chopper unit.
The
first is politically sensitive; nobody's eager to do the second;
so even though forces may use Pakistani bases for refueling
and emergencies, the Kitty Hawk, sailing in the Arabian Sea,
is likely to be the primary base of sustained special operations.
Once
in theater, much of the work of tracking down bin Laden and
his lieutenants will fall to the supersecret Delta Force. Forming
into 15- to 21-man troops or four- to six-man teams, they will
chopper into place, flying into canyons under cover of darkness.
Then,
protected by Kevlar body armor, they will fast-rope to the ground,
bending under the weight of night-sighted M-4 carbines and grenade
launchers, carrying radios and handheld global-positioning gear.
Some
of the teams will feature snipers; others will race across the
desert in specially equipped dune buggies; yet others will practice
their mountaineering skills, crawling over Afghanistan's rugged
mountains.
For
many search-and-destroy missions, the aim will be to get in
and out so fast that forces stay on the ground in Afghanistan
for less than an hour.
...
And then there is--apart from the skinning alive--Afghanistan's
most frightening contribution to modern warfare: the cave. Afghanistan's
limestone cliffs are honeycombed with them, many with multiple
entrances and all of them capable of being booby-trapped.
Pentagon
officials are convinced that bin Laden and his top associates
are holed up in caves and that they might move to a different
one every day.
Some
are big enough to be seen in satellite images, and the Air Force
has already targeted them. GBU-28 bunker-buster bombs can drill
like masonry bits through 20 ft. of stone before detonating,
and B-2s dropped the behemoths on several caves last week.

Pentagon
officials got excited when secondary explosions from inside
the caves continued for hours after the initial attacks.
Fuel-air explosives are also handy; an explosive aerosol can
be injected into the entrance of a cave and then ignited. Anyone
left inside will suffocate and be fried to a crisp.
...
"We're going to figure out this cave business as we go
along," says a former special-forces commando. In much
the same way, they will figure out what to do if they catch
up with bin Laden or another al-Qaeda leader.
In
that event, the special forces would have to choose between
a "snatch-and-grab" mission--tossing their target
into a helicopter and getting out fast--or a "blow-and-go,"
in which case the captive would be killed.

Special forces "fast roping"
from a Pave Low helicopter
...
All these plans assume that the leadership of al-Qaeda remains
in Afghanistan. U.S. intelligence officials are convinced that
bin Laden is indeed still there.
But
sources tell TIME they are worried that other leaders of both
al-Qaeda and the Taliban may have slipped out of the country,
or be trying to. Their favored destinations are thought to be
Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia. (U.S. officials are
also trying to check movements into Somalia, Chechnya and Sudan.)
...
For now, however, the focus remains on Afghanistan. In the mountains
and deserts, winter is approaching; with its onset, said Admiral
Sir Michael Boyce, chief of the British defense staff, "things
will slow down a bit."
But
only a bit.
The
war may be won by small teams of dedicated warriors, but by
most standards this is going to be a pretty big show. The Pentagon
intends to send more troops to the region next week.
...
The soldiers, brave and resourceful though they may be, will
be able to do little to head off a looming humanitarian disaster.
Afghanistan is one of the poorest, most war-racked and drought-ridden
places on earth. So far, humanitarian drops of food by U.S.
planes have had little impact on the food shortage. ...
-
- - end excerpts - - -
Source:
|