Simple, really.

If you hear not of the christ myth, you
have no ability to believe it.

In other words, your immortal destiny,
per most christian dogma, is dependent
totally on the environment outside of you.

Is there any valid argument, by christians,
for a dogma of self-determination and 'free
will' yielding your immortal destiny, yet your
immortal destiny is dependent totally on the
dogma you're exposed to which is totally
outside of your control?

In other words, if you're not exposed to the
myth, how can you be held to account for
a belief/non-belief of the myth being of criti-
cality regarding your personal destiny?

. . .

Furthermore, if exposed to the myth, how in the
world can you determine the verity regarding if
the myth is just made-up fiction as opposed to
true revelation?

By what possible measure/means can christians
assert that their belief is true/valid and doubt of
their belief is meritorious for damnation/eternal
torment?

Is there any logical underpinning whatsoever for
their 'believe or else' modality?

They push their 'we're the *only* way' mentality
on everyone but do they have anything other than
claims of magic beings/events and 'believe or else'
to offer?

- - -

So, let's say you're born ...

... and are exposed to no gods, ever.

You're raised free of religion and gods.

You mate.

You have kids.

You die.

One question.

What is your immortal destiny, per christian
philosophy?

- - -